, , , , , ,

From an article I edited heavily and “lost” the address to written by a pro-Palestinian, pro-two state solution, anti-settlement, propaganda writing hater of Israel that indirectly points out what happens in a society always under attack by an enemy within its borders.

A subculture of fighting back using the same tactics as the enemy will develop particularly in the youth that grow up in it. One more reason to remove the Palestinians to Jordan and Syria. Deport Arabs and import Jews.

That’s what Assyria did to the Kingdom of Samaria. They deported all the Jews to the north of Israel and brought in their own. “In the ninth year of Hoshea, the King of Assyria captured Samaria. He deported the Israelites to Assyria and settled them in Halah, at the [River] Habor, at the River Gozen, and in the towns of Media.” [2Kings 17/6]

2Kings 17/24-35 “The king of Assyria brought [people] from Babylon, Cuthah, Avva, Hamath, and Sepharvaim, and he settled them in the towns of Samaria in place of the Israelites; they took possession of Samaria and dwelt in its towns.

25When they first settled there, they did not worship the Lord; so the Lord sent lions against them which killed some of them.

26They said to the king of Assyria: “The nations which you deported and resettled in the towns of Samaria do not know the rules of the God of the land; therefore He has let lions loose against them which are killing them—for they do not know the rules of the God of the land.”

27The king of Assyria gave an order: “Send there one of the priests whom you have deported; let him go and dwell there, and let him teach them the practices of the God of the land.”

28So one of the priests whom they had exiled from Samaria came and settled in Bethel; he taught them how to worship the Lord.

29However, each nation continued to make its own gods and to set them up in the cult places which had been made by the people of Samaria; each nation [set them up] in the towns in which it lived.

30The Babylonians made Succoth-benoth, and the men of Cuth made Nergal, and the men of Hamath made Ashima,

31and the Avvites made Nibhaz and Tartak; and the Sepharvites burned their children [as offerings] to Adrammelech and Anamelech, the gods of Sepharvaim.

32They worshiped the Lord, but they also appointed from their own ranks priests of the shrines, who officiated for them in the cult places.

33They worshiped the Lord, while serving their own gods according to the practices of the nations from which they had been deported.

34To this day, they follow their former practices. They do not worship the Lord [properly]. They do not follow the laws and practices, the Teaching and Instruction that the Lord enjoined upon the descendants of Jacob—who was given the name Israel—

35with whom He made a covenant and whom He commanded: “You shall worship no other gods; you shall not bow down to them nor serve them nor sacrifice to them.”

Samaria was the Northern Kingdom often referred to as the Kingdom of Israel (it included the land of most of the Tribes, north of Judah and the land of the Tribe of Benjamin).

From the referenced “lost” article:

“The Law of the King” is really two books in one. The first is a legal treatise offering new interpretations and applications of traditional Jewish legal sources regarding rules of engagement and the use of force against civilians. The second, interspersed in six “appendixes” throughout the book, is a work of mystical philosophy devoted to explaining the differences between Jewish and non-Jewish souls. Its views are mostly drawn, the writers say, from the teachings of Ginsburgh.

The metaphysical dimension is equally shocking. The authors write: “In a perfected situation, there would be no prohibition on the killing of a non-Jew, because the existence of a non-Jew who does not fulfill the basic commandments is not legitimate.” Behind this position lies a mystical view that the soul of the non-Jew has less value than the Jewish soul. Indeed, the authors opine that a Jew may kill an innocent non-Jew to preserve his own life, although he may not kill an innocent Jew for the same purpose.

Many conclusions of the book would be disputed by most Orthodox rabbis. But the sources cited and discussed are all perfectly ordinary Biblical and rabbinic materials. The religious tradition offers sufficient material to justify the intentional killing of innocents — provided the sources are interpreted the way the terrorists want. In short, “The Law of the King” provides a legal and theological blueprint for revenge killings of the kind undertaken by the new Jewish terrorists. As far as the terrorists are concerned, their actions are not merely permitted by Jewish law, but required.

There is a possible means for suppressing this new Jewish terrorism, which Israel must at least contemplate. That would involve shutting down the institutions where the particular brand of messianic, nationalist mystical religion is taught. It would involve suppressing the teachings of those who provide the ideological justification and inspiration for the movement — perhaps even arresting them for incitement to racism and incitement to violence, both of which are crimes under Israeli law.


Deport Arabs and import Jews. Every Arab country has deported Jews. It is the way of the Middle-East.

We know what HaShem would do from 2Kings 17/26 “They said to the king of Assyria: ‘The nations which you deported and resettled in the towns of Samaria do not know the rules of the God of the land; therefore He has let lions loose against them which are killing them—for they do not know the rules of the God of the land.”